Oh, to kill again!
Normally when I post my impressions of a game I do it at least a couple of times throughout the time that I'm playing it but for some reason, possibly because I was plodding through it at such a slow pace, I never even mentioned that I'd even been playing Assassin's Creed 2 (Xbox 360) on here. Well, I have been, and I FINALLY fucking beat it! I got 1000/1000 achievements and, more or less, "one hundred percented" the game too, just a I did with its predecessor. The verdict? I loved it.
"The entire city is yours... to murder."
Foremost on my mind as I started playing the game, other than how nice their engine is holding up, was that despite the differences between it and the first Assassin's Creed, they were still very, very similar. I was a little surprised at just how similar they were since so many reviewers and the like said that even if you disliked Assassin's Creed you should give Assassin's Creed 2 a shot - I can only agree with this opinion to a point. Let me go into some details before I break this conclusion of mine down though.
First, and this is a big one for players who hated the first game, free running/parkour, despite minor improvements, is almost identical to what we had in the first game, which, in my mind is sublimely smooth most of the time. Like in the first game, however, you can occasional hit moments where your character will seemingly inexplicably (I say seemingly because it is probably my own fault most of the time) jump the wrong direction, grab the wrong thing, or otherwise not behave how you expect him to. This can really break up this otherwise enjoyable part of the game and kill the immersion a bit - one minute you're a badass assassin effortlessly bounding the rooftops in search of your next mark, and the next instead of gracefully running across a line tied between buildings, you just decide to hop off the side and plummet 75 feet to your death. Wow. This felt the most silly the couple of times it happened when doing "leaps of faith" and instead of jumping cleanly into a bale of hay I instead dove head first for the cobblestone road below. Well, so much for faith... 
"I've slaughtered so many of these poor roof top guards that I actually kind of feel sorry for them now."
One thing definitely worth mentioning relating to the free running, given that it is such a big part of the game, is that it is used in more creative ways this time around. As you progress in the environments you run into structures that require more creative climbing. This is expanded on much, much more in the various "Assassin Tombs" and "Templar Lairs" in the game which transform your character's city traversing parkour into a Prince of Persia series like puzzle/platforming experience. Most of the time, except for when you run into some of the above mentioned rough points, this works quite well and is a great change of pace for the series, even if it did make me use my brain a bit more than I was expecting to going into this game.
AC2's combat system feels like a good analogy for the whole game, really. It is almost exactly the same as the first game's, only with some subtle improvements and the addition of some new options at the player's disposal. A lot of the time these improvements and additions don't feel truly needed but they at least succeed in giving players a tiny bit more choice and variety and apparently a lot of people needed those things. As someone who liked the first game already, more is usually better, and they didn't overdo it or otherwise ruin a good thing here. It does indeed feel like improvement and refinement.
"Who is my friend? Oh, it's only Leonardo FUCKING Da Vinci!"
The single most important improvement to AC2 over AC, and the one that feels the largest to boot, is the story. AC2's story is much more involving with frequent cutscenes and more varied, plot related missions and, depending on how quickly you decided to proceed (this is STILL an open world game, after all) it frequently pushes the pace of the plot along and even succeeds in doing some interesting things with it along the way. We also have a much more sympathetic character in Ezio than we had with Altair - Ezio was pretty likable and had a fair amount of personality. I wasn't one of those people that felt like Altair was a huge asshole but Ezio is an entirely different, and much more fleshed out character. As for the story itself it went places I wasn't expecting it to despite thinking I had a pretty good handle on things. The end was pretty out there, leaving me scratching my head for a moment, and revealing much more about the overarching plot of the series than I expected them to give us.
The improvement in the story and the variety brought along by the more active plot development should go a long way in fighting off the burn out due to repetitiveness that a lot of people complained about with the first game. Assassinations and introductions to new areas are now more driven by the story than the formulaic system of tasks that those parts of the game devolved into before. I do have one word of warning though: while flags are gone there are still various collection systems in the game, the most similar to the flags being the feathers. If gathering flags was part of the reason for your burn out in the first game then I'd highly suggest avoiding as many of these tasks as you can altogether, or at least saving them until after beating the game proper.
"Alright men, gather 'round him and watch as he kills us all one by one!"
I could ramble on a lot more about the game and in a lot more detail but I'll cut myself off. Back to the conclusion I referred to before. Like I said, I loved it, but I also loved the first one despite its flaws. Still, it is hard for me to recommend Assassin's Creed 2 to someone who absolutely hated the first Assassin's Creed - again, it is largely the same game with some improvements, some needed more than others, and a new setting with all kinds of awesome Italian accents. If you were simply turned off by minor issues in the first game then certainly check it out, otherwise you might as well wait until we see what Assassin's Creed 3 brings to the table. Of course by then it is possible that you won't have ANY FUCKING CLUE what is going on in this batshit crazy conspiracy story.
I have no idea what Assassin's Creed 3 will be. It could literally take place anywhere, at any time, and they could change the gameplay in any number of ways. So far I like where they're headed though. I'm a little puzzled (and maybe put off) by the announcement of Assassin's Creed Brotherhood but I can't imagine not playing it at this point unless it just gets awful reviews. I would like to request that if they keep adding in requirements to complete things in stealthy means they add some more traditional stealth mechanics to our assassin's repertoire of abilities though.
One more note: I played the game with the 2 "additional" DLC chapters intact and feel like I would have definitely missed not having them there, at least story wise, so I'd recommend picking them up if you care about that sort of thing and/or consider yourself a fan of the series. They were a tiny bit buggy, with sound dropping out on me a few different times during cut scenes, which I had heard others mention as well. Still, worth it.
As usual with Xbox 360 games I stole all of my screenshots from other people. It was really hard to find decent, non-PR released bullshots for this game. Most, if not all of these are from the PC version.
Gay Tony and Me
Well, I finally completed The Ballad of Gay Tony last weekend. I can't say I'm quite as positive about it as I was about my The Lost and Damned playthrough though. I don't know precisely what my main issue was. Perhaps I'm just experiencing some general GTA 4 burnout? Maybe this playthrough was a bit too soon after TLaD? I'm not entirely sure. While I'll dish out some positives later let me continue this train of through and bring up some of my specific negative issues first:
While the missions were generally more "over the top" and varied than those in the previous two installments of GTA 4 the disparity wasn't quite as large as I was under the impression it might be after hearing so many other people laud the game for them. It still felt very much like Grand Theft Auto IV territory the entire time. The only real new thing was the parachuting/base jumping mechanic which would have been right at some in San Andreas or Saints Row.
"Our protagonists."
Next, the characters weren't quite as enjoyable to me as those in the previous two titles. Gay Tony himself wasn't the easiest character to fall in love with thanks to his drug problems and the often stupid, reckless decisions he makes that drive the story. While the lead character, Luis Lopez, seemed quite interesting at first I felt like his character actually devolved as the game came to an end. I went from intrigued about his history with prison, his relationship with his family, particularly his father, and of course his friendship with Gay Tony to completely bored of him and his frequent comments about how he's "a total psychopath, bro!" and "likes killing people for money, bro!" As a lot of people took issue with Niko's various anti-social crimes and violent acts seeming to be at odds with his character in the first installment of GTA 4 I found there to be something a bit disingenuous about the pairing of Luis's character as it is presented to us with his apparent fondness for murder.
I still have some gripes about the checkpoint system. In my original rambling post about GTA 4 I had a few complaints about the system but only specifically touched on the number and placement of checkpoints being an issue. In my playthrough of TBoGT, however, I was completely annoyed by an entirely different aspect of the system: When I die during a mission (which is typically why I fail missions) I hate, absolutely HATE, having to wait to load up at the hospital, wait to get and reply to my "retry?" text message, and wait yet again to load back up at the mission checkpoint. I realize that Rockstar probably does it this way to give the player more options before retrying and ultimately help instill a further sense of persistence in the GTA 4 gameworld, but I'd so rather prefer a simple "retry?" prompt to pop up on the screen the second I fail a mission. Honestly, I can normally really respect the persistent world aspect to these kinds of game design decisions but in this case I feel like the fun factor should have weighed a bit heavier into the equation. The funny thing is that I didn't even fail that many times in TBoGT, certainly not as much as I did in GTA 4 proper, so I'm not quite sure why it annoyed me so much this time but didn't in the past. Hmph.
"This is for all of those food poisoning victims!"
Finally, after the much more streamlined narrative of The Lost and Damned The Ballad of Gay Tony's story didn't feel quite as fetching nor well told. There's really no need to go into specifics about this point, it's just my general take-away after playing both DLCs fairly close together.
Anyway, enough bitching! Is it good? Yes, it is good. I can safely say that if you're a GTA fan and you enjoyed GTA 4 you should probably go out of your way to own both The Lost and Damned and The Ballad of Gay Tony. In fact, save yourself some hard drive space and buy the Episodes from Liberty City disk. Plus you get to rock out to Vice City FM and the awesome RamJam FM.
Both times now when I've come back to Liberty City I've been blown away by what an amazing job Rockstar did on the city itself. Sure it doesn't always look amazing (some of the textures, particularly) but the amount of detail is astounding! I always felt that much of that detail was squandered since there are so many locations you don't really spend any time in or only see in a blur as you fly down the highway. Still, occasionally I end up on foot in a strange new place thinking "wow, this place is pretty neat for somewhere you never go in any missions or anything." To that end I'm sure the guys who did the bulk of the development work on the city were quite happy to see it brought back in The Lost and Damned and again in The Ballad of Gay Tony.
"Yes, there is finally a tank. Upgrade!"
I also still think the character and story crossovers are totally genius. Niko, Johnny, and Luis all influence each others stories, sometimes directly and sometimes more subtly, but it is there and it is often presented in such a way that you have to wonder if Rockstar didn't have these different stories, and maybe others we'll never get to experience, penned down from the get go. Again, totally brilliant!
Well, I've already written a lot more on this than I had planned too. Again, if you're a big GTA 4 then you need this. I personally think The Lost and Damned was a better, more cohesive game but TBoGT is well worth your time as well. I have to wonder if we'll see more, non Xbox 360 exclusive episodes in the future. I wouldn’t doubt if they've considered it but I'm sure all the guys at Rockstar are probably ready to move on by now.
As usual my Xbox 360 screenshots were swiped from far more reputable sources.
And I Can’t Deny.
"Tonight there's gonna be a jailbreak... somewhere in this town!"
I beat Grand Theft Auto 4: The Lost and Damned last weekend. I don't have a lot to say about the ending - it wasn't disappointing but it wasn't as good as I felt like it could have been. Still, great game and, again, worth the 20 bucks if you're a GTA fan. Oh, and I loved the ending credits which showed these slow motion, panoramic, birds eye views of scenes from both GTA 4 and TLAD and how some of them tied Niko and Johnny together. Very enjoyable.
The next game I've picked to play out of my Xbox 360 backlog is Battlefield: Bad Company. I'm a big fan of the series starting all the way back with the original Battlefield 1942 on PC but I've never really got into any of the attempts to bring the series to the console. I played a healthy amount of the demo of the Xbox Battlefield 2: Modern Combat and watched some friends play the Xbox 360 version when it first came out but these console version just never seemed to be as appealing to me as the PC versions. Bad Company, built from the ground up as a console game with actual effort being put into the single player mode, seemed like it could be a good opportunity to break the mold and indeed reviews of the game were pretty favorable.
The game greets you with an awesome little lounge tune on the menu screen that feels humorously out of place for a war game (obviously intentionally) and brings in some nice cinematic cut scenes as you kick off the campaign. A great first impression. Once I got into the game, however, I was immediately sapped by the odd field of view the game gives you - it seems super narrow and therefore feels unusually zoomed in compared to most first person games. This wasn't a problem, per say, it just took a little getting used to.
Once I played around in the game a bit I was quite impressed by this new "Frostbite" engine that DICE put together. The graphics look pretty good with some interesting lighting and shadow effects. The maps are fairly large and the draw distance seems quite respectable. I didn't really notice any crazy pop in or other issues like that either - in fact the only real immersion breaking thing I ran into was the disappearance of destroyed vehicles after a couple of minutes - it seems rather odd for destroyed vehicles and dead bodies to vanish when so much effort has been put on making the environment destructible. You can knock the side off of the building and it's gone for good, yet the wreckage of the giant heavy tank next to it vanishes into thin air? Eh, that's a little knit pick I suppose.
"Yeah, it's kind of a fixer-upper."
Speaking of the environmental destruction though... Wow! It's great. Trees, signs, fences, etc. all (finally!) fall down when your tank goes barreling into them. Some shots even seem to leave craters in the ground. The experience of walking through a forest only to have a group of trees suddenly fall all around you from a surprise cannon blast is totally unique to say the least. The world doesn't necessarily feel too delicate though - your dune buggy won't be knocking walls off of buildings and you're not going to spray your assault rifle into a forest and watch dozens of trees come cascading down.
As far as buildings go I was pretty skeptical at first given that you can't blow up everything. Indeed, only certain walls will blow out - you can't completely knock a building down to it's foundation or anything that drastic but it is an still extremely effective. With tanks firing cannon rounds, helicopter firing rockets, and soldiers lobbing RPGs and grenades all over the place in a lot of these fire fights it is great to actually see some tangible destruction as a result.
There was at least one occasion where a couple of enemy soldiers were holed up in a barracks and the door was on the other side of the building from where I was standing. I decided rather than go around the barracks and risk getting shot at from the windows just to lob a M203 round at the side of the wall and walk straight in. There have also been a few occasions where the illusion of safety presented to me by taking cover behind a wall in typical video game fashion suddenly went out the window as the wall I was hiding behind crumbled down and I was left completely exposed. On the other end of the spectrum during one firefight I was dashing between buildings evading enemy fire when an enemy chucked a grenade at me. It didn't injure me notably but it did destroy the wall to a building behind me suddenly revealing another enemy who, apparently finding his morning shave to be much less of a priority, started firing on me from my other side. Neat.
Beyond the destructible environment the engine seems to have quite a lot of nice effects that help the action feel more alive. On that front the sound in this game is also great. While I wouldn't suggest that the sounds themselves are particularly realistic they're very satisfying. Thumbs up to the responsible parties at DICE.
Guns feel pretty good though I do wish the damage was a little higher. I just hate having to pump half a magazine into a dude to kill him. Vehicles, so far, feel decent enough though the controls took a bit of getting used to. I've still yet to climb into a chopper at this point though. The controls for on foot are pretty good though - you can swap between weapons with the right shoulder button and between other gear with the left. The right trigger fires while the left zooms to your iron sights. The other gear I mentioned can be anything from C4, RPGs, and laser designators to your trusty healing syringe. Melee (a knife) has it's own button but seems to deploy a little too slowly for my tastes, especially after playing Halo 3 recently.
"I've got my eyes on you, tree!"
The healing syringe system is pretty different - you can switch to this item and heal yourself completely with the press of a button as often as you like. While there is a recharge timer to keep you from spamming your heal it is pretty short. It kind of reminds me of a manual take on the whole Halo shield recharge system that so many games have barrowed over the years. As silly and unrealistic as it is I think I actually like it. Speaking of health, when you do actually die you don't really incur much of a penalty. You're basically revived a short distance from where you died, with your squad, with everything you did just before dying persisting. Between those two features you can feel pretty invincible at times even during some of the more difficult sections that have you healing and respawning constantly.
Your squad mates have it easy too. They never really die, they don't need to be healed, and they'll even rubber band to your position when need be. In fact as soon as you hop in a vehicle, no matter where they are on the map, they're in it with you. Pretty unrealistic but it works well enough. On the other hand it does give you the impression that your character is the focus of the game despite the story telling you otherwise - that is, your character is the new guy in your squad and you're certainly not the leader, yet your squad mates follow you around and never seem to object to any decisions you make. To be honest this stood out as feeling a little odd to me from the very beginning - your squad leader pretty much only actually leads in cut scenes. Ah well, at least these AI squad members are actually capable of killing enemies from time to time.
One last thing to mention is the humor. I honestly thought there would be a lot more of it. Sure, there are a few funny lines here and there but what little comedy is there often fails to impress me and I'm certainly not one of those people who is exceedingly snobby when it comes to humor. Probably the opposite, even.
I'm about half way through the game and looking forward to wrapping it up relatively quickly. I haven't even stepped foot into multiplayer which is a significant portion of the game, if not the focus. It seems to have a lot of great features and, given the rest of the game, could be great. If I started playing it when it was first released and/or had friends playing it on a regular basis I could definitely seem myself dumping a considerable amount of time into it but most likely won't even try it during this playthrough.
Ugh, now I've got the song "Bad Company" stuck in my head now and I've had "Jailbreak" stuck in my head on and off for weeks now thanks to TLAD.
Screenshots lifted from somewhere else since I can’t easily take HD console screenshots.